Lenoir v. Roll Coater, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that employee's threat to kill two coworkers provided sufficient basis for discharge
• holding that “one weak reason,” even if supported by 14 substantial evidence, “is insufficient to meet the ‘specific, clear and convincing’ 15 standard” for rejecting a claimant’s testimony
• noting that racial epithets have “no place in the employment setting”
• noting the court’s responsibility to determine whether disputed 14 issues of material fact are present
• affirming dismissal of complaint where it lacked “sufficient, 14 non-conclusory allegations plausibly linking the disciplinary action to discrimination on the basis 15 of sex”
• case law interpreting § 1988 applies equally to the task of 14 determining a reasonable fee under the EAJA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Lenoir v. Roll Coater, Inc.

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Lenoir v. Roll Coater, Inc.
  N.D. Indiana· 1992-04-13· cited 13×