Skip to main content
· 8/10/2001

Harry C. Dunn, III v. Nordstrom, Inc.

Citations

  • 260 F.3d 778
  • 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18067
  • 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,709
  • 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 915
  • 2001 WL 898757

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the plaintiff “must present more than his own, subjective self- appraisal to create a genuine issue of fact”
  • stating that the plaintiff “must present more than his own, subjective self-appraisal to create a genuine issue of fact”
  • stating that the plaintiff “must present more than his own, subjective self- appraisal to create a genuine issue of fact”
  • noting that, under Title VII retaliation burden-shifting analysis, even if plaintiff can establish a prima facie case, defendant may avoid liability by articulating legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its action
  • holding employer entitled to weigh plaintiff’s accomplishments against deficiencies
  • a plaintiff asserting discrimination “must present more than his own, subjective self-appraisal to create a genuine issue of fact”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fairchild, Cudahy, Coffey

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.