· 8/10/2001
Harry C. Dunn, III v. Nordstrom, Inc.
Citations
- 260 F.3d 778
- 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 18067
- 81 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 40,709
- 86 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 915
- 2001 WL 898757
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that the plaintiff “must present more than his own, subjective self- appraisal to create a genuine issue of fact”
- stating that the plaintiff “must present more than his own, subjective self-appraisal to create a genuine issue of fact”
- stating that the plaintiff “must present more than his own, subjective self- appraisal to create a genuine issue of fact”
- noting that, under Title VII retaliation burden-shifting analysis, even if plaintiff can establish a prima facie case, defendant may avoid liability by articulating legitimate, nondiscriminatory reasons for its action
- holding employer entitled to weigh plaintiff’s accomplishments against deficiencies
- a plaintiff asserting discrimination “must present more than his own, subjective self-appraisal to create a genuine issue of fact”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fairchild, Cudahy, Coffey
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.