Skip to main content
· 6/15/2005

Alex F. Beamon v. Marshall & Ilsley Trust Company

Citations

  • 411 F.3d 854
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 11246
  • 86 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 41,995
  • 95 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1797
  • 2005 WL 1399307

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding no inherently racial component to an employer giving an employee a critical, even an unfairly critical, performance review
  • “not every perceived unfairness in the workplace may be ascribed to discriminatory motivation merely because the complaining employee belongs to a [protected group]”
  • “There is no inherently racial component to an employer providing an employee with a critical (even an unfairly critical
  • for purposes of evaluating a hostile work environment claim, “not every perceived unfairness in the workplace may be ascribed to discriminatory motivation merely because the complaining employee belongs to a racial minority”
  • “[T]he alleged harassment must be sufficiently connected to race before it may reasonably be construed as being motivated by the defendant’s hostility to the plaintiff’s race.”
  • “There is a presumption that the prevailing party will recover costs, and the losing party bears the burden of an affirmative showing that taxed costs are not appropriate.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Manion, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.