Alaska Supreme Court· 5/18/1973
Lee v. State
Citations
- 509 P.2d 1088
- 1973 Alas. LEXIS 359
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that attorney may effectively waive client’s right to be present in noncapital criminal case if “(1) the defendant has given counsel express authority in a knowing and intelligent manner, (2
- right to be present at trial cannot be “waived” by counsel unless defendant knowingly and intelligently joins therein
- right to be present at trial cannot be \waived\ by counsel unless defendant knowingly and intelligently joins therein
- “The psychological distinction between a general poll in [the defendant’s] absence, and an individual poll requiring each juror to assume the burden of his decision and affirm it in the defendant’s presence is not a minor one.”
- prejudicial error where jury returned verdict in defendant’s absence because had he been present, defendant could have insisted on a jury poll, thus exposing each juror to the psychological impact of announcing his decision directly to the defendant
- decided under Alaska R.Crim. P. 38
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rabinowitz, Connor, Erwin, Boochever, Jj-, Fitzgerald
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- State v. MortonSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1998-07-30· cited 222×
- State v. RiceWashington Supreme Court· 1988-06-09· cited 168×
- David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, Superintendent, David Lewis Rice v. Tana Wood, SuperintendentNinth Circuit· 1996-02-20· cited 104×
- George Earl Larson v. Robert Tansy, WardenTenth Circuit· 1990-08-10· cited 90×
- State v. HannaganAlaska Supreme Court· 1977-03-11· cited 56×
- Luu v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado· 1992-11-16· cited 52×
- Hughes v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1973-09-10· cited 48×
- Dolchok v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1982-01-22· cited 35×
- Dixon v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1980-01-18· cited 34×
- Koehler v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1974-02-22· cited 30×
- State v. LevatoArizona Supreme Court· 1996-09-05· cited 29×
- Kimes v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1989-10-31· cited 24×
- Snyder v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1974-07-15· cited 21×
- Pease v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 2002-09-27· cited 20×
- In Re Hospitalization of Connor J.Alaska Supreme Court· 2019-03-22· cited 17×
- Jerrel v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1993-05-14· cited 16×
- Osborne v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-02-13· cited 14×
- Andrew v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-01-25· cited 14×
- v. BurnellColorado Court of Appeals· 2019-09-12· cited 10×
- Meyer v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1981-05-01· cited 9×
Cites
16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
- Glasser v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1942-02-09· cited 10,035×
- Henry v. MississippiSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 1,121×
- Diaz v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1912-02-19· cited 1,035×
- Aetna Insurance v. Kennedy Ex Rel. BogashSupreme Court· 1937-05-17· cited 531×
- Love v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1969-08-08· cited 340×
- Speidel v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1969-10-21· cited 81×
- Milton Cureton v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1968-04-18· cited 69×
- Harold S. Cross v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1963-11-14· cited 66×
- Kugzruk v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1968-02-02· cited 60×
- Robert Lee Evans v. United StatesSixth Circuit· 1960-11-23· cited 55×
- Lanier v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1971-06-29· cited 52×
- Parker v. United StatesFourth Circuit· 1950-10-10· cited 42×
- Brown v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1962-06-07· cited 42×
- Echert v. United StatesEighth Circuit· 1951-04-19· cited 40×
- Noffke v. StateAlaska Supreme Court· 1967-01-13· cited 35×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.