State v. Hannagan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that state has right to appeal in post-conviction relief proceeding because such proceedings are separate from original criminal proceeding and are governed by civil procedure
• holding that state has right to appeal in post-conviction relief proceeding because such proceedings are separate from original criminal proceeding and are governed by civil procedure
• “There is no allegation here that there was communication between the court and the jury without counsel for both sides present.”
• \There is no allegation here that there was communication between the court and the jury without counsel for both sides present.\
• error to permit playback of testimony in defendant's absence without express waiver by defendant
• state may appeal adverse determination of a Rule 35 proceeding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).