Supreme Court of Colorado· 11/16/1992

Luu v. People

Citations

841 P.2d 271
16 Brief Times Rptr. 1783
1992 Colo. LEXIS 1033
1992 WL 332781

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that defendant’s interpreter’s absence during closing arguments and the giving of jury instructions was harmless
holding that defendant's interpreter's absence during closing arguments and the giving of jury instructions was harmless
holding that deprivation of the right to be present was a “trial error”
holding that deprivation of the right to be present was a \trial error\
noting that allegations of a denial of the right to be present are scrutinized under the harmless error standard
characterizing deprivation of the right to be present as a trial error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vollack, Quinn, Lohr, Kirshbaum

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

35 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.