California Court of Appeal· 8/30/1979
Larmour v. Campanale
Citations
- 96 Cal. App. 3d 566
- 158 Cal. Rptr. 143
- 1979 Cal. App. LEXIS 2094
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- judicial proceeding privilege was applicable to letters demanding settlement of claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buttermore
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Club Valencia Homeowners Ass'n v. Valencia AssociatesColorado Court of Appeals· 1985-10-03· cited 562×
- Kirschstein v. HaynesSupreme Court of Oklahoma· 1990-01-30· cited 101×
- Blanchard v. DirecTV, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-10-29· cited 69×
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-03-28· cited 67×
- Financial Corp. of America v. WilburnCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-02-18· cited 48×
- Rosenthal v. Irell & ManellaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1982-08-17· cited 48×
- Price v. ArmourUtah Supreme Court· 1997-12-09· cited 42×
- Knoell v. PetrovichCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-11-09· cited 31×
- Abraham v. Lancaster Community HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-01-30· cited 26×
- McCarthy v. YempukuHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals· 1984-02-21· cited 24×
- Block v. First Blood AssociatesS.D. New York· 1988-07-06· cited 21×
- Laffer v. Levinson, Miller, Jacobs & PhillipsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1995-04-21· cited 21×
- Herzog v. \A\ Co.California Court of Appeal· 1982-12-13· cited 20×
- Stanley Hagendorf v. David A. Brown, Martin W. BasisztaNinth Circuit· 1983-02-15· cited 18×
- Krawitz v. RuschCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1989-04-18· cited 18×
- Premier Communications Network, Inc. v. FuentesNinth Circuit· 1989-07-26· cited 15×
- Post v. MendelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1985-07-10· cited 11×
- Kanengiser v. KanengiserNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1991-03-14· cited 11×
- Paul v. Premier Electrical Construction Co.N.D. Illinois· 1984-03-22· cited 5×
- Arochem International, Inc. v. BuirkleS.D. New York· 1991-06-24· cited 3×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Albertson v. RaboffCalifornia Supreme Court· 1956-04-10· cited 360×
- Lerette v. Dean Witter Organization, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1976-07-29· cited 101×
- Smith v. HatchCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1969-03-25· cited 42×
- Frank Pisano & Associates v. TaggartCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1972-11-30· cited 40×
- Jenssen v. R. K. O. Studios, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1937-05-07· cited 8×
- Pactor Corp. v. Manpower Inc. of SacramentoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1967-07-28· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.