Price v. Armour

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[a] privilege protects those who make otherwise defamatory statements from legal liability”
• explaining that the near-identical language of a predecessor rule under the Utah Code of Judicial Administration \clearly required that the [district] court grant [a party's] request for a hearing unless either of the two exceptions applied\
• finding trial court erred in not complying with rule 4-501 but affirming because error was harmless
• applying harmless error analysis to a trial court’s failure to hold a hearing under rule 4-501(3) of the Utah Rules of Judicial Administration
• intentional interference with business relationships, and noting in dicta that the privilege should apply to all causes of action
• “[JJudges, jurors, witnesses, litigants, and counsel in judicial proceedings have an absolute privilege against defamation.” (quotations and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).