· 4/18/1989
Krawitz v. Rusch
Citations
- 209 Cal. App. 3d 957
- 257 Cal. Rptr. 610
- 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 370
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a non-dealer seller of a car had no duty either to install seatbelts or to warn of them absence to purchaser
- “For a negligence cause of action, the plaintiff must allege a duty, a breach of that duty, and injury to the plaintiff as a proximate result of that breach”
- driving inexperience did not necessarily indicate incompetence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dabney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.