Skip to main content
· 4/18/1989

Krawitz v. Rusch

Citations

  • 209 Cal. App. 3d 957
  • 257 Cal. Rptr. 610
  • 1989 Cal. App. LEXIS 370

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a non-dealer seller of a car had no duty either to install seatbelts or to warn of them absence to purchaser
  • “For a negligence cause of action, the plaintiff must allege a duty, a breach of that duty, and injury to the plaintiff as a proximate result of that breach”
  • driving inexperience did not necessarily indicate incompetence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Dabney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.