Kanengiser v. Kanengiser

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a letter sent by an attorney demanding the payment of money owed and informing a party that his client intended to pursue arbitration was protected by New Jersey’s litigation privilege
• establishing that trustees and beneficiaries of a trust had a significant interest in potential litigation regarding the trust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).