California Court of Appeal· 10/29/2004
Blanchard v. DirecTV, Inc.
Citations
- 20 Cal. Rptr. 3d 385
- 123 Cal. App. 4th 903
- 2004 Daily Journal DAR 13338
- 2004 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9785
- 2004 Cal. App. LEXIS 1830
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that “[t]he litigation privilege is simply a test of connectedness or logical relationship to litigation,” and noting that a party cannot avoid application of the privilege by arguing that statements were published to coerce a settlement
- “The litigation privilege is simply a test of connectedness or logical relationship to 22 litigation,” and noting that a party cannot avoid application of the privilege by arguing that 23 statements were published to coerce a settlement
- applying litigation privilege to prel-itigation communications by attorneys
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Aldrich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Flatley v. MauroCalifornia Supreme Court· 2006-07-27· cited 768×
- Neville v. CHUDACOFFCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-03-12· cited 146×
- 1100 PARK LANE ASSOCIATES v. FeldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2008-02-25· cited 143×
- People Ex Rel. Gallegos v. Pacific Lumber Co.California Court of Appeal· 2008-02-01· cited 86×
- Tourgeman v. Nelson & KennardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-01-16· cited 49×
- People ex rel. Strathmann v. Acacia Research Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2012-10-24· cited 48×
- Dickinson v. CosbyCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-11-21· cited 43×
- Schwarzburd v. Kensington Police Protection & Community Services District BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-04-30· cited 36×
- Bailey v. BrewerCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-07-19· cited 29×
- Kevin Breazeale v. Victim Services, Inc.Ninth Circuit· 2017-12-27· cited 27×
- Steed v. Department of Consumer AffairsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2012-03-08· cited 27×
- Tutor-Saliba Corp. v. HerreraCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-01-10· cited 26×
- Foundation for Taxpayer & Consumer Rights v. GaramendiCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-09-27· cited 25×
- Stenehjem v. SareenCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-06-13· cited 21×
- Delois v. Barrett Block PartnersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-08-24· cited 20×
- RSB Vineyards, LLC v. OrsiCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2017-09-29· cited 19×
- Visto Corp. v. Sproqit Technologies, Inc.N.D. California· 2005-03-17· cited 14×
- Plumbers & Steamfitters, Local 290 v. DuncanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-12-11· cited 11×
- Dealertrack, Inc. v. HuberC.D. California· 2006-10-26· cited 11×
- The Inland Oversight Comm. v. County of San BernardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-08-17· cited 8×
Cites
28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Silberg v. AndersonCalifornia Supreme Court· 1990-02-26· cited 660×
- Woodland Hills Residents Ass'n v. City Council of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court· 1979-04-03· cited 376×
- Pacific Legal Foundation v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court· 1982-12-20· cited 314×
- Rubin v. GreenCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-04-05· cited 287×
- Kashian v. HarrimanCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-05-23· cited 260×
- HMS Capital, Inc. v. Lawyers Title Co.California Court of Appeal· 2004-04-30· cited 186×
- Tuchscher Development Enterprises, Inc. v. San Diego Unified Port DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-03-12· cited 161×
- Lerette v. Dean Witter Organization, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1976-07-29· cited 101×
- Rothman v. JacksonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-10-01· cited 88×
- Fuhrman v. California Satellite SystemsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1986-03-28· cited 67×
- Mattel, Inc. v. Luce, Forward, Hamilton & ScrippsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-06-28· cited 55×
- Aronson v. KinsellaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1997-10-10· cited 45×
- Brenton v. Metabolife International, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2004-03-04· cited 36×
- Knoell v. PetrovichCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-11-09· cited 31×
- Families Unafraid To Uphold Rural El Dorado County v. El Dorado County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-03-29· cited 31×
- Drum v. Bleau, Fox & AssociatesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-04-09· cited 30×
- DirecTV, Inc. v. EQ Stuff, Inc.C.D. California· 2002-05-08· cited 28×
- Williams v. San Francisco Board of Permit AppealsCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1999-09-08· cited 26×
- Jewett v. Capital One BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2003-12-22· cited 26×
- Larmour v. CampanaleCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1979-08-30· cited 25×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.