Skip to main content

Lancaster v. State

Citations

  • 2002 WY 45
  • 43 P.3d 80
  • 2002 Wyo. LEXIS 49
  • 2002 WL 464922

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • trial court erred in showing videotaped statement to jury without first viewing it and identifying those portions admissible as a prior consistent statement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lehman, Golden, Hill, Kite, Voigt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

69 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.