· 2/15/1991
Charles Lindgren v. Michael P. Lane
Citations
- 925 F.2d 198
- 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 2397
- 1991 WL 17051
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that a prosecutor's comment during closing argument that defense counsel is attempting to \trick\ the jury by presenting \illusions\ is a permissible means of arguing so long as the comments are not overly excessive
- find- ing witness’s reference to the defendant’s silence, without evidence that the prosecutor used or was permitted to use that testimony, did not violate the Fifth and Four- teenth Amendments
- evaluating separately the defendant's post-arrest silence and request for counsel
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Cummings, Easterbrook, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.