Skip to main content

Farrow v. State

Citations

  • 437 P.3d 809

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • When the objection made at trial differs from the argument on appeal, the plain error standard of review applies.
  • “[T]wo individuals who mutually agree to fight are both considered aggressors, making a self-defense theory unavailable to either of them.”
  • if specific objection is not made to an instruction, review is for plain error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Boomgaarden, Davis, Fox, Gray, Kautz

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

53 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.