Lark v. Bi-Lo, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an appellate courts review of appeals from the Commission is limited to deciding whether the Commissions decision is unsupported by substantial evidence or is controlled by some error of law
• holding that an appellate courts review of appeals from the Commission is limited to deciding whether the Commissions decision is unsupported by substantial evidence or is controlled by some error of law
• holding that an appellate court’s review of appeals from the Commission is limited to deciding whether the Commission’s decision is unsupported by substantial evidence or is controlled by some error of law
• noting that the APA was enacted \to provide uniform procedures before State Boards and Commissions\ (emphasis added)
• noting that the APA was enacted \to provide uniform procedures before State Boards and Commissions\ (emphasis added)
• noting that the APA was enacted “to provide uniform procedures before State Boards and Commissions” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).