Skip to main content
· 7/23/2001

Sea Pines Ass'n for the Protection of Wildlife, Inc. v. South Carolina Department of Natural Resources

Citations

  • 550 S.E.2d 287
  • 345 S.C. 594
  • 2001 S.C. LEXIS 137

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding there must be an \injury in fact\ for standing to exist
  • stating that to establish standing, the plaintiff must prove (1) an injury in fact, which is concrete, particularized, and actual or imminent; (2) a causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of; and (3
  • concluding Appellants, who were comprised of wildlife organizations, did not have standing to challenge the decision by the Department of Natural Resources to issue permits to lethally reduce deer population in wildlife sanctuary because they failed to allege a particularized harm
  • describing the second element of standing as a \causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of\
  • setting forth the first element of standing and describing the second element of standing as a \causal connection between the injury and the conduct complained of\
  • recognizing Lujan as the test for standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Toal, Moore, Waller, Burnett, Pleicones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.