Corbin v. Kohler Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining the commission determines the weight and credibility to afford expert medical testimony
• \Expert medical testimony is intended to aid the Appellate Panel in coming to the correct conclusion.\
• \Expert medical testimony is intended to aid the Appellate Panel in coming to the correct conclusion.\
• \'[T]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency's findings from being supported by substantial evidence.'\ (quoting Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc. , 336 S.C. 266, 282, 519 S.E.2d 583, 591 (Ct. App. 1999))
• \'[T]he possibility of drawing two inconsistent conclusions from the evidence does not prevent an administrative agency's findings from being supported by substantial evidence.'\ (quoting Muir v. C.R. Bard, Inc. , 336 S.C. 266, 282, 519 S.E.2d 583, 591 (Ct. App. 1999))
• “In an appeal from the Appellate Panel, neither this court nor the circuit court may substitute its judgment for that of the Appellate Panel as to the weight of the evidence on questions of fact, but it may reverse when the decision is affected by an error of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).