Tiller v. National Health Care Center

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• instructing that the Appellate Panel’s findings of fact are conclusive as to conflicting evidence, whether from different witnesses or from the same witness,
• holding proof that workers’ compensation claimant sustained an injury may be established by circumstantial and direct evidence
• stating that where there is a conflict in the evidence, either by different witnesses or by the same witness, the appellate panel’s findings of fact are conclusive
• stating that medical testimony should not be held conclusive irrespective of other evidence
• stating that medical testimony should not be held conclusive irrespective of other evidence
• confirming that medical testimony should not be held conclusive irrespective of other evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).