Shealy v. Aiken County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that substantial evidence supported finding that stressors unrelated to work \contributed to or caused\ mental injury
• holding that the full commission is “the ultimate fact finder”
• holding that the requirement of “unusual or extraordinary conditions in employment” for a claimant to recover for a mental-mental injury refers to conditions to the particular job in which the injury occurs, not to conditions of employment in general
• holding a general ruling by the trial court is insufficient to preserve a specific issue for appellate review
• holding a general ruling by the trial court is insufficient to preserve a specific issue for appellate review
• holding the appellate panel is specifically reserved the task of assessing the credibility of the witnesses and the weight to be accorded evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).