Adams v. Adams

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in determining whether to award permanent periodic alimony, the trial court must consider the requesting spouse’s needs and the other spouse’s ability to pay

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Zeigler v. Zeigler
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-01-14· cited 41×
• Farrior v. Farrior
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1999-06-24· cited 20×
• Mitzenmacher v. Mitzenmacher
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-04-12· cited 14×
• Krafchuk v. Krafchuk
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-10-03· cited 13×
• Heinrich v. Heinrich
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-24· cited 12×
• Farrior v. Farrior
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-06-12· cited 5×
• Baird v. Baird
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-02· cited 4×
• Rosen v. Rosen
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-05-03· cited 4×
• Stough v. Stough
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-27· cited 4×
• Register v. Register
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-04-04· cited 3×
• Webb v. Webb
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-05-17· cited 3×
• Lynch v. Lynch
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-18· cited 1×
• Rucker v. Rucker
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-03-14

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Canakaris v. Canakaris
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1980-03-27· cited 2,288×
• O'Neal v. O'Neal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-17· cited 68×
• Reback v. Reback
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-05-07· cited 53×
• Lash v. Lash
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1975-02-05· cited 48×
• Akers v. Akers
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-06-21· cited 26×
• Schwartz v. Schwartz
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1974-06-18· cited 23×
• Lanier v. Lanier
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-02-11· cited 22×
• Bible v. Bible
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-04-14· cited 15×
• Royal v. Royal
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1972-06-13· cited 14×
• Walser v. Walser
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1985-08-07· cited 12×
• Claughton v. Claughton
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1986-01-14· cited 7×
• Clance v. Clance
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-02-14· cited 7×
• Meachum v. Meachum
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-05-31· cited 4×
• Teague v. Teague
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-10-25· cited 3×