Skip to main content

Landry v. State

Citations

  • 620 So. 2d 1099
  • 1993 WL 230139

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that prosecutor's references to officers'\unblemished records\ could not be considered harmless \[b]ecause this case came down to a swearing match between the officers and appellant's witnesses\
  • concluding that prosecutor's references to officers' \unblemished records\ could not be considered harmless \[b]ecause this case came down to a swearing match between the officers and appellant's witness\
  • finding it improper for the State to ask an officer about his lack of disciplinary reports
  • error to refuse to allow defense to cross-examine police officer about past investigation by the FBI where he had been suspected of using excessive force
  • query as to why the police officers would risk all their years and their unblemished records improperly constituted impermissible bolstering of officers' testimony by matters not supported by the record
  • query as to why the police officers would risk all their years and their unblemished records improperly constituted impermissible bolstering of officers' testimony by matters not supported by the record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

31 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.