Skip to main content

Landry v. State

Citations

  • 706 S.W.2d 105
  • 1985 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1747

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that any improper jury argument is waived by a party’s failure to object
  • holding that any improper jury argument is waived by a party’s failure to object
  • noting that Landry failed to point to any particular verbal outcry or demonstrate how victim’s family’s emotional responses reasonably could have interfered with jury’s verdict
  • noting that Landry failed to point to any particular verbal outcry or demonstrate how victim's family's emotional responses reasonably could have interfered with jury's verdict
  • “Conduct from bystanders which interferes with the normal proceedings of a trial will not result in reversible error unless the defendant shows a reasonable probability that the conduct interfered with the jury's verdict.”
  • although admission of photo lineups was improper corroboration evidence, photos could not have added more credibility to prior identification testimony because photos were merely redundant and, therefore, could not have influenced jury on issue of identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Campbell, Clinton, Ground, Teague, Grounds, Nos, State

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

119 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Landry v. State

46 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.