Skip to main content

Lewis v. State

Citations

  • 780 So. 2d 125
  • 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 497
  • 2000 WL 561162

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that comments made during closing should be reviewed to determine whether they (1) deprive the appellant of a fair trial; (2) materially contribute to a conviction; (3) are so harmful or fundamentally tainted as to require a new trial; (4
  • describing as the “most egregious” of several highly improper and impermissible comments made by a prosecutor as the one suggesting that defense counsel had “scripted” the defendant’s testimony
  • prosecutor's suggestions to jury during closing arguments that defense counsel improperly cross-examined the State's only eye witness were improper and deprived the defendant of a fair trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schwartz, C.J. and Jorgenson, Cope, Levy, Gersten, Goderich, Green, Fletcher, Shevin, Sorondo and Ramirez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.