A. McD. v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing “[i]t is axiomatic that failure to proffer what the excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of the alleged error”
• failure to proffer what excluded evidence would have revealed precludes appellate consideration of alleged error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).