Landers v. State Farm Lloyds

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding trial court did not err in granting no-evidence motion for summary judgment in absence of timely response
• concluding that a trial court did not abuse its discretion by denying a motion for continuance when the appellant waited to seek the continuance until after the deadline for responding to the motion for summary judgment
• holding trial court did not err in granting no-evidence motion for summary judgment in absence of timely response
• “Absent a timely response, a trial court must grant a no-evidence motion for summary judgment that meets the requirements of Rule 166a(i
• no abuse of discretion where neither motion nor affidavit described movant’s diligence to secure additional discovery
• no abuse of discretion where neither motion nor affidavit described movant's diligence to secure additional discovery

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).