MacK Trucks, Inc. v. Tamez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that expert testimony was necessary to determine which of multiple potential sources caused the fire on a fuel truck
• holding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying bill of exception and excluding evidence
• holding that, to avoid summary judgment, nonmovant must present evidence raising genuine issue of material fact as to each element challenged in no-evidence summary-judgment motion
• holding that trial court properly excluded expert testimony because expert set out facts that were consistent with his opinion but failed to connect those facts to his conclusion
• noting that the criteria to be used to evaluate the reliability of expert testimony depends on the nature of the evidence
• holding trial court's refusal to receive additional evidence and reconsider its ruling was not fundamental error

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).