Rizkallah v. Conner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that witness’s affidavit is conclusory if it fails to explain basis of witness’s statements to link his conclusions to facts
• holding that witness’s affidavit is conclusory if it fails to explain basis of witness’s statements to link his conclusions to facts
• holding that witness’s affidavit is conclusory if it fails to explain basis of witness’s statements to link his conclusions to facts
• holding that witness’s affidavit is conclusory if it fails to explain basis of witness’s statements to link his conclusions to facts
• holding that an affidavit that contains statements that are incompetent as summary judgment proof may support a motion for summary judgment if the remaining statements contain sufficient factual information to sustain the movant’s burden of proof
• holding that lack of response by nonmovant “does not supply by default the summary judgment proof necessary to establish the movant’s right to summary judgment” and that nonmov-ant “is limited on appeal to arguing the legal sufficiency of the grounds presented by movant”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).