Skip to main content
· 8/31/2006

LMB, LTD. v. Moreno

Citations

  • 201 S.W.3d 686
  • 49 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 1019
  • 2006 Tex. LEXIS 784
  • 2006 WL 2506030

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that the expert’s evidence was conclusory because the physician simply stated “in my opinion, the conduct of [LMB] substantially caused Ernestina Moreno’s injuries and death”
  • holding that bare legal conclusion is not competent summary- judgment evidence
  • holding that bare legal conclusion is not competent summary-judgment evidence
  • applying law that legal conclusions in an affidavit made without supporting facts do not constitute competent summary judgment evidence
  • applying settled law that legal conclusions, stated without supporting facts in affidavit, do not constitute competent summary judgment evidence
  • applying settled law that legal conclusions, stated without supporting facts in affidavit, do not constitute competent summary judgment evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Per Curiam

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.