Skip to main content

Lahr v. State

Citations

  • 731 N.E.2d 479
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1068
  • 2000 WL 968446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “not every communication between an attorney and .client is deemed a ‘confidential communication’ entitled to a reasonable expectation of confidentiality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Baker, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.