Skip to main content
· 2/16/1995

Corll v. Edward D. Jones & Co.

Citations

  • 646 N.E.2d 721
  • 63 U.S.L.W. 2576
  • 1995 Ind. App. LEXIS 120
  • 1995 WL 65512

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding privilege applied to attorneys’ meeting with group of prospective plaintiffs in class action; all met to discuss “a matter of joint concern and were present to further a common interest” even though not all participants in meeting agreed to pursue litigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Najam, Baker, Friedlander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.