· 7/14/2000
Lahr v. State
Citations
- 731 N.E.2d 479
- 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1068
- 2000 WL 968446
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “not every communication between an attorney and .client is deemed a ‘confidential communication’ entitled to a reasonable expectation of confidentiality”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kirsch, Baker, Riley
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.