Skip to main content
· 7/14/2000

Lahr v. State

Citations

  • 731 N.E.2d 479
  • 2000 Ind. App. LEXIS 1068
  • 2000 WL 968446

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “not every communication between an attorney and .client is deemed a ‘confidential communication’ entitled to a reasonable expectation of confidentiality”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Kirsch, Baker, Riley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.