In Re Antitrust Grand Jury

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that ordinary work product may be disclosed if there has been client fraud
• concluding that ordinary work product may be disclosed if there has been client fraud
• noting in camera review of documents “could have assisted the court in determining whether” probable cause existed to apply the crime–fraud exception
• ordering the district court to require disclosure of opinion work product should it find that the attorneys were “knowing and willing conspirators in the alleged crime”
• adopting a “probable cause” standard similar to that of the 2d Circuit
• “We are persuaded by the Second Circuit’s enunciation and adopt it as our evi-dentiary standard of a prima facie showing”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).