Kimberly J. Brook v. State of Indiana

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the Circuit has “embraced the doctrinal view disfavoring suits against federal enforcement authorities administering anti-discrimination laws” when there are “remedies against the discriminating entity . . . adequate so as to preclude APA review”
• finding agency action arbitrary and capricious in failing to address relevant evidence before it
• finding agency action “arbitrary and capricious because [it] failed adequately to address relevant evidence before it”
• finding agency action arbitrary and capricious in failing to address relevant evidence before it
• “This court, in turn, in determining whether an adequate remedy exists, has focused on whether a statute provides an independent cause of action or an alternative review procedure.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).