Fifth Circuit· 7/18/1983
Kvue, Inc. v. Moore
Citations
- 709 F.2d 922
- 54 Rad. Reg. 2d (P & F) 224
- 9 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2334
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 25737
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “That the statute has not been enforced and that there is no certainty that it will be does not establish the lack of a case or controversy. The state has not disavowed enforcement.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Jegley v. PicadoSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2002-07-05· cited 100×
- Bland v. FesslerNinth Circuit· 1996-07-02· cited 51×
- Town of Ball v. Rapides Parish Police JuryFifth Circuit· 1984-11-19· cited 46×
- In Re VolpeW.D. Texas· 1989-04-28· cited 40×
- Community Title Co. v. Roosevelt Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals· 1984-03-20· cited 38×
- Raymond Wayne Hill v. The City of Houston, TexasFifth Circuit· 1986-05-14· cited 36×
- Fenning v. Glenfed, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1995-12-08· cited 33×
- Peyote Way Church of God, Inc. v. William F. Smith, Attorney General of the United States and Jim Mattox, Attorney General of the State of TexasFifth Circuit· 1984-09-24· cited 29×
- Raymond Wayne Hill v. The City of Houston, TexasFifth Circuit· 1985-09-04· cited 27×
- David Verner Tousley v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Fourth Circuit· 1985-01-10· cited 26×
- Hurley v. Lederle Laboratories, Division of American Cyanamid Co.E.D. Texas· 1986-12-31· cited 24×
- United States v. Joseph ZadehFifth Circuit· 2016-04-21· cited 22×
- Missouri Pacific Railroad v. Railroad Commission of TexasW.D. Texas· 1987-01-27· cited 10×
- T.I.M.E.-D C, Inc. v. I.A.M. National Pension FundDistrict of Columbia· 1985-08-06· cited 9×
- Knudsen v. United StatesM.D. Florida· 1987-07-31· cited 7×
- Trucke v. ErlemeierN.D. Iowa· 1987-03-04· cited 7×
- Ramos v. ThornburghE.D. Texas· 1989-07-21· cited 6×
- Valley View Health Care, Inc. v. ChapmanE.D. California· 2014-01-16· cited 6×
- American Civil Liberties Union of Mississippi, Inc. v. MabusS.D. Mississippi· 1989-07-27· cited 5×
- Sagan ex rel. Registered Voters v. Pennsylvania Public Television NetworkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-07-28· cited 5×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Younger v. HarrisSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 14,568×
- Baker v. CarrSupreme Court· 1962-03-26· cited 6,173×
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 5,797×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court· 1983-05-02· cited 3,306×
- Middlesex County Ethics Committee v. Garden State Bar Ass'nSupreme Court· 1982-06-21· cited 3,061×
- Rice v. Santa Fe Elevator Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-05-05· cited 2,636×
- Steffel v. ThompsonSupreme Court· 1974-03-19· cited 2,574×
- Babbitt v. United Farm Workers National UnionSupreme Court· 1979-06-05· cited 2,028×
- Florida Lime & Avocado Growers, Inc. v. PaulSupreme Court· 1963-06-17· cited 1,897×
- Anderson v. CelebrezzeSupreme Court· 1983-04-19· cited 1,828×
- Fidelity Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. De La CuestaSupreme Court· 1982-06-28· cited 1,769×
- Jones v. Rath Packing Co.Supreme Court· 1977-05-16· cited 1,459×
- Storer v. BrownSupreme Court· 1974-05-28· cited 1,395×
- Doran v. Salem Inn, Inc.Supreme Court· 1975-06-30· cited 1,283×
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court· 1975-06-24· cited 1,202×
- SAMUELS Et Al. v. MACKELL, DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF QUEENS COUNTY, Et Al.Supreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 1,137×
- Perez v. LedesmaSupreme Court· 1971-02-23· cited 1,061×
- United States v. GraceSupreme Court· 1983-04-20· cited 1,050×
- Muskrat v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1911-02-20· cited 763×
Other cases named Kvue, Inc. v. Moore
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.