Skip to main content
· 4/28/1989

In Re Volpe

Citations

  • 100 B.R. 840
  • 3 Tex.Bankr.Ct.Rep. 408
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 739
  • 1989 WL 50598

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the three levels of preemption which might arise with respect to a given federal law
  • state exemption statute was not preempted as it was not “related to” ERISA within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. section 1144(a)
  • state exemption statute was not preempted as it was not “related to” ERISA within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. section 1144(a)
  • state exemption statute was not preempted as it was not “related to” ERISA within the meaning of 29 U.S.C. section 1144(a)
  • state exemption statute not preempted, adopting Volpe analysis

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Larry E. Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.