Ramos v. Thornburgh

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he inability to work for the extended period … may compel an applicant to abandon his or her asylum application … [and] subject the applicant to even more severe persecution upon return to the country he or she has attempted to flee.”
• “It cannot validly be disputed that an unreasonable denial of work authorization, or … delay … in work authorization, results in a substantial threat of harm to plaintiffs, by preventing them from working to support themselves pending resolution of their claims for asylum.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).