Trucke v. Erlemeier

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that the United States Supreme Court abandoned the Norton rationale and suggesting that “if Norton and its progeny were decided today, the outcome would be different”
• observing that the United States Supreme Court abandoned the Norton rationale and suggesting that Aif Norton and its progeny were decided today, the outcome would be different@
• claim is not ripe if threat of injury is speculative

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).