Skip to main content
· 12/31/2002

Kvassay v. Hasty

Citations

  • 236 F. Supp. 2d 1240
  • 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25116
  • 2002 WL 31929153

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that there was “insufficient evidence to find as a matter of law that the [defendants] ‘regularly collect debts’ ” because “[t]he majority of the facts regarding the volume and percentage of the [defendants’] debt collection practices have not been established”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Marten

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.