· 12/31/2002
Kvassay v. Hasty
Citations
- 236 F. Supp. 2d 1240
- 2002 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 25116
- 2002 WL 31929153
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that there was “insufficient evidence to find as a matter of law that the [defendants] ‘regularly collect debts’ ” because “[t]he majority of the facts regarding the volume and percentage of the [defendants’] debt collection practices have not been established”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Marten
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.