Franceschi v. Mautner-Glick Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the plaintiff did not “even allege that he suffered confusion” about the relationship between the alleged debt collector and the creditor, and finding the false name exception inapplicable
• dismissing FDCPA claim against building owner where plaintiff “d[id] not even allege that he suffered confusion as to the relationship between” the owner and the management agent who sent a collection letter to plaintiff
• management company was not a “debt collector” where company “ ‘obtained’ the right to collect Franceschi’s debt, that is his rent, before it became overdue”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).