Donna M. Russell v. Equifax A.R.S., and Cbi Collections

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring that validation notice be understood by the “least sophisticated consumer”
• “[A] collection notice is deceptive when it can be reasonably read to have two or more different meanings, one of which is inaccurate.”
• ‘[A] collection notice is deceptive when it can be reasonably read to have two or more different meanings, one of which is inaccurate.’”
• “Because the initial collection notice in the instant case was reasonably susceptible to an inaccurate reading, it was also deceptive within the meaning of the Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).