Omari v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the exhaustion requirement was met where the \petitioners made some concrete statement before the BIA to which they could reasonably tie their claims\
• holding that claims must first be presented to the BIA or they are not administratively exhausted and are jurisdictionally barred
• recognizing that the exhaustion requirement was met where the “petitioners made some concrete statement before the BIA to which they could reasonably tie their claims”
• holding that this court lacks jurisdiction to consider arguments not first presented to the BIA
• concluding that, for purposes of exhaustion, petitioners must make “some concrete statement before the BIA to which they could reasonably tie their claims before this court”
• recognizing that failure to exhaust an issue before the BIA strips us of jurisdiction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).