Skip to main content
· 9/14/2010

Duhaney v. Attorney General of United States

Citations

  • 621 F.3d 340
  • 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 19131
  • 2010 WL 3547434

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing “the general proposition that res judicata may be applied to adjudicative proceedings under the INA”
  • discussing factors relevant to determining the same cause of action for res judicata purposes, including “whether the acts complained of [are] the same”
  • \[T]he relevant factual occurrence is the conviction or convictions giving rise to a charge of removability.\
  • “The doctrine of res judicata bars not only claims that were brought in a previous action, but also claims that could have been brought.”
  • “[T]he relevant factual occurrence is the conviction or convictions giving rise to a charge of removability.”
  • “Congress has repeatedly amended the immigration laws to facilitate the removal of aliens who have been convicted of aggravated felonies.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ambro, Chagares, Greenaway

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.