Valerii Krougliak v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting petitioner’s new evidence because it appeared that “other individuals” could have obtained it prior to petitioner’s hearing before IJ
• rejecting petitioner’s new evidence because it appeared that “other individuals” could have obtained it prior to petitioner’s hearing before IJ
• approving the BIA’s construction of a motion to remand as a motion to reopen
• upholding BIA’s denial of a motion to reopen based on new evidence—specifically, a letter allegedly from a Ukranian government official claiming continued persecution of Greek Catholics in Ukraine— because the evidence was in existence at the time of his hearing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).