Skip to main content

Klaassen v. Allegro Development Corp.

Citations

  • 106 A.3d 1035
  • 2014 WL 996375
  • 2014 Del. LEXIS 119

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that former CEO had acquiesced to his removal by his recognition of the removal and his subsequent conduct
  • holding that voidable act was “properly subject to equitable defenses” and finding that challenge was “barred by the doctrine of acquiescence”
  • concluding that the defendant had acquiesced in the boards’ acts to remove him as chief executive officer
  • holding that voidable act was “properly subject to equitable defenses” and finding that challenge was “barred by the doctrine of acquiescence”
  • holding that voidable act was “properly subject to equitable defenses” and finding that challenge was “barred by the doctrine of acquiescence”
  • noting that element of acquiescence defense is that claimant freely does something that amounts to recognition of complained-of act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Berger, Holland, Jacobs, Johnston, Ridgely

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

64 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.