Gantler v. Stephens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an officer of a Delaware corporation owes 5 fiduciary duties of care and loyalty to the corporation
• holding that 8 Del. C. § 102(b)(7) does not authorize the exculpation of corporate officers
• holding that plaintiffs had pled sufficient facts to rebut the business judgment rule presumption by well-pleading that defendant board members terminated discussions to sell the company for self-interested reasons
• holding that “enhancing the corporation’s long term share value” is a “distinctively corporate concern[]”
• holding that “enhancing the corporation’s long term share value” is a “distinctively corporate concern[]”
• holding that “enhancing the corporation’s long term share value” is a “distinctively corporate concern[]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).