Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Cantor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating a claim for unjust enrichment requires an “unjust retention” of a benefit
• “It is also appropriate to consider the impact an injunction will have on the public and on innocent third parties.”
• no “immediate, irreparable harm” based on the plaintiff’s own decision to “improvidently reduc[e] commissions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).