Court of Chancery of Delaware· 7/12/1998
Cantor Fitzgerald, L.P. v. Cantor
Citations
- 724 A.2d 571
- 1998 Del. Ch. LEXIS 120
- 1998 WL 409371
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating a claim for unjust enrichment requires an “unjust retention” of a benefit
- “It is also appropriate to consider the impact an injunction will have on the public and on innocent third parties.”
- no “immediate, irreparable harm” based on the plaintiff’s own decision to “improvidently reduc[e] commissions”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Steele
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
88 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Nemec v. ShraderSupreme Court of Delaware· 2010-04-06· cited 620×
- Iwanowa v. Ford Motor Co.D. New Jersey· 1999-10-28· cited 155×
- Jackson National Life Insurance v. KennedyCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1999-07-15· cited 84×
- In Re Del Monte Foods Co. Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2011-02-14· cited 79×
- Klaassen v. Allegro Development Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 2014-03-14· cited 78×
- Hollinger International, Inc. v. BlackCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2004-02-26· cited 77×
- Clay v. American Tobacco Co.S.D. Illinois· 1999-07-09· cited 77×
- In Re El Paso Corporation Shareholder LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2012-02-29· cited 38×
- Pell v. KillCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2016-05-19· cited 32×
- In Re Pfizer Inc. Shareholder Derivative LitigationS.D. New York· 2010-07-13· cited 31×
- In Re Zoran Corp. Derivative LitigationN.D. California· 2007-06-05· cited 29×
- In Re Brocade Communications Systems, Inc. Derivative LitigationN.D. California· 2009-01-06· cited 26×
- In Re G-I Holdings, Inc.Third Circuit· 2014-06-17· cited 23×
- Cirrus Holding Co. v. Cirrus Industries, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2001-07-19· cited 18×
- Next Level Communications, Inc. v. Motorola, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2003-02-26· cited 16×
- Abrons v. MareeCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-09-20· cited 13×
- In Re the New Maurice J. Moyer Academy, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2015-01-09· cited 12×
- In Re NCS Healthcare, Inc., Shareholders LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2002-11-25· cited 9×
- In Re Pozen S'holders Litig.North Carolina Business Court· 2005-11-10· cited 6×
- Braintree Laboratories, Inc. v. Schwarz Pharma, Inc.D. Delaware· 2008-07-31· cited 5×
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-05-03· cited 245×
- Fleer Corp. v. Topps Chewing Gum, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1988-04-06· cited 111×
- Paramount Communications, Inc. v. Time Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1990-03-09· cited 105×
- Northwestern National Insurance v. Esmark, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1996-02-14· cited 99×
- Realty Growth Investors v. Council of Unit OwnersSupreme Court of Delaware· 1982-10-26· cited 75×
- Sealy Mattress Co. of New Jersey v. Sealy, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1987-07-24· cited 62×
- Richard Paul, Inc. v. Union Improvement Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1952-08-04· cited 54×
- Frank v. Wilson & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1943-05-05· cited 49×
- City Capital Associates Ltd. Partnership v. Interco Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1988-11-01· cited 41×
- Frank v. Wilson & Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1939-11-08· cited 17×
- Newell Co. v. Wm. E. Wright Co.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1985-10-15· cited 4×
- Marta v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of NYD. Delaware· 1995-05-30· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.