Supreme Court of Delaware· 3/14/1985
Smith v. Van Gorkom
Citations
- 488 A.2d 858
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that \Trans Union’s board was grossly negligent in that it failed to act with informed reasonable deliberation in agreeing to the Pritzker merger proposal_\
- holding that directors may be personally liable in money damages for gross negligence in the decision-making process
- holding that merger price offered by CEO in a leveraged buyout could not be accepted as adequate without further investigation since the offer only calculated the amount that would allow the CEO to perform the transaction
- holding that \the directors of Trans Union breached their fiduciary duty to their stockholders (1) by their failure to inform themselves ... and (2) by their failure to disclose all material information” and that \an award of damages maybe entered”
- finding that the board of directors violated its duty of care in evaluating a merger proposal and recommending it for shareholder approval
- finding that by failing to disclose facts and showing hasty careless approval of merger by its members from shareholders, the board breached its duty to disclose.
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Herrmann, McNeilly, Horsey, Moore, Christie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
262 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Brehm v. EisnerSupreme Court of Delaware· 2000-02-09· cited 877×
- Cede & Co. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-01-18· cited 456×
- In Re Caremark International Inc. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1996-09-25· cited 387×
- Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1986-03-13· cited 386×
- Abry Partners V, L.P. v. F & W Acquisition LLCCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-02-14· cited 354×
- Unocal Corp. v. Mesa Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-06-10· cited 322×
- In Re Santa Fe Pacific Corp. Shareholder LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware· 1995-11-22· cited 306×
- Kahn v. Lynch Communication Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-04-05· cited 299×
- Grobow v. PerotSupreme Court of Delaware· 1988-03-15· cited 295×
- Malone v. BrincatSupreme Court of Delaware· 1998-12-18· cited 273×
- Rosenblatt v. Getty Oil Co.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-05-09· cited 268×
- Paramount Communications Inc. v. QVC Network Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-02-04· cited 265×
- Arnold v. Society for Savings Bancorp, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1994-12-28· cited 251×
- Trenwick America Litigation Trust v. Ernst & Young, L.L.P.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 2006-08-10· cited 250×
- Stroud v. GraceSupreme Court of Delaware· 1992-04-09· cited 246×
- Mills Acquisition Co. v. MacMillan, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1989-05-03· cited 245×
- Gantler v. StephensSupreme Court of Delaware· 2009-01-27· cited 244×
- Cinerama, Inc. v. Technicolor, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1995-07-17· cited 242×
- In Re Walt Disney Co. Derivative LitigationCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 2005-08-09· cited 206×
- Jardel Co., Inc. v. HughesSupreme Court of Delaware· 1987-03-23· cited 198×
Cites
39 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-03-01· cited 1,206×
- Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1983-02-01· cited 690×
- Interstate Circuit, Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1939-02-13· cited 677×
- Guth v. Loft, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1939-04-11· cited 466×
- Zapata Corp. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware· 1981-05-13· cited 335×
- Levitt v. BouvierSupreme Court of Delaware· 1972-01-04· cited 265×
- Donovan v. CunninghamFifth Circuit· 1983-10-17· cited 264×
- Sinclair Oil Corporation v. LevienSupreme Court of Delaware· 1971-06-18· cited 258×
- Pogostin v. RiceSupreme Court of Delaware· 1984-06-21· cited 195×
- Schnell v. Chris-Craft Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1971-11-29· cited 164×
- Michelson v. DuncanSupreme Court of Delaware· 1979-10-02· cited 142×
- Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware· 1974-01-10· cited 116×
- Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1983-02-28· cited 114×
- Deberry v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware· 1983-01-27· cited 112×
- Allied Chemical & Dye Corp. v. Steel & Tube Co. of AmericaCourt of Chancery of Delaware· 1923-03-28· cited 104×
- Gimbel v. Signal Companies, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1974-02-07· cited 100×
- Lynch v. Vickers Energy Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1977-10-18· cited 94×
- Gottlieb v. Heyden Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware· 1952-08-29· cited 88×
- Beard v. ElsterSupreme Court of Delaware· 1960-02-11· cited 85×
- Cheff v. MathesSupreme Court of Delaware· 1964-03-17· cited 83×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.