Skip to main content

Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.

Citations

  • 11 Del. Ch. 80
  • 95 A. 895
  • 1915 Del. Ch. LEXIS 18

Syllabus

<p>Though General Corporation Law (22 Del. Laws, c. 394) § 8, provides that until directors are elected the signers of a certificate of.incorporation shall have the direction of the affairs and of the organization of the corporation, etc., and though in perfecting the organization they act as incorporators, and not as stockholders, and though possibly each incorporator is entitled to the benefit of the others' help in the discharge of such duties, and may decline to act with the holder of a proxy from other incorporators, yet where three incorporators, being the only stockholders and persons interested, acquiesced in two of them acting by proxy at a meeting to organize the corporation, the meeting was valid, and could not be impeached by them or any one else.</p> <p>A special meeting of the directors of a corporation was invalid where one of the directors was not present, and neither had nor waived notice prior to the meeting, though after the meeting he signed a waiver of notice and signed the minutes of the meeting, since, while presence at the meeting waives notice, and so a waiver may properly be executed before the meeting, a waiver subsequent to the meeting is ineffective.</p> <p>The personal presence of each director of a corporation at a meeting of the board of directors is obligatory, and a director cannot vote by proxy, as his personal judgment is necessary, and he cannot delegate or assign or abdicate his powers.</p> <p>A director of a corporation by signing a notice of'a meeting of the directors did not agree that another director, although absent from the meeting, could, by subsequently assenting to the proceedings by signing the minutes, discharge his duties as a director, or be treated as making a quorum.</p> <p>General Corporation Law, § 138, providing that, when any notice is required thereunder, a waiver in writing, whether before or after the time stated therein, shall be equivalent thereto, does not authorize a director to waive notice of a speci

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the reason a director cannot act by proxy is that “his associates are entitled to his judgment, experience and business ability, just as his associates cannot deprive him of his rights and powers as director”
  • explaining that the reason a director cannot act by proxy is that “his associates are entitled to his judgment, experience and business ability, just as his associates cannot deprive him of his rights and powers as director”
  • “Each member of a corporate body has the right to consultation with the others and has the right to be heard upon all questions considered.”
  • “Each member of a corporate body has the right to consultation with the others and has the right to be heard upon all questions considered.”
  • “Each member of a corporate body has the right to consultation with the others and has the right to be heard upon all questions considered.”
  • “It is, of course, fundamental that a special meeting held without due notice to all the directors is not lawful[.]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases named Lippman v. Kehoe Stenograph Co.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.