King v. Dogan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an amended complaint supersedes an original complaint unless it adopts or incorporates the original complaint by reference
• holding that an amended complaint supersedes an original complaint unless it adopts or incorporates the original complaint by reference
• holding that an “amended complaint supersedes the original complaint and renders it of no legal effect unless the amended complaint specifically refers to and adopts or incorporates by reference the earlier pleading.”
• noting that “[a] plaintiff’s verified complaint can be considered as summary judgment evidence to the extent that it comports with the requirements of” Rule 56(c)
• explaining that a plaintiff could not rely on a verified complaint as summary judgment evidence be- cause that complaint was superseded by an unverified amended complaint
• finding that an amended complaint 1 The Plaintiff filed the Amended Complaint [20] without leave of court or consent from the Defendants pursuant to Rule 15(a)(1)(B

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).