Anson McFaul v. Daniel Valenzuela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring plaintiffs to show that their treatment was “different from that received by similarly situated individuals” and that the treatment “stemmed from a discriminatory intent”
• “An assertion that prison officials failed to follow prison rules or policies does not set forth a 7/ 9 constitutional claim.”
• “An assertion that prison officials failed to follow prison rules or policies does not set forth a constitutional claim.”
• “[s]ummary judgment may not be thwarted by conclusional allegations, unsupported assertions, or presentation of only a scintilla of evidence.”
• “In re- viewing summary judgment, this court construes all facts and inferences in the light most favorable to the nonmoving party.”
• “An assertion that prison officials failed to follow prison rules or policies does not set forth a constitutional claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).